What is the remedy when police violate your Fourth Amendment rights? In the landmark case of Mapp v. Ohio, the Supreme Court created an “exclusionary rule” that deems inadmissible any evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Professor Paul Cassell explains the exclusionary rule and explores whether it’s time for the Supreme Court to reconsider it. | The Federalist Society

In Mapp v. Ohio (1961) the Supreme Court established the exclusionary rule, which excludes from trial evidence obtained by illegal searches and seizures. Can some evidence obtained by an illegal search still be admitted in court? Professor Paul Cassell explains five exceptions to the exclusionary rule. | The Federalist Society